The Worst IOC Ever- I apologize in advance
Okay, so the first thing I will address is that I went over time... by a lot. So, with that, I'm docking some points because I apparently can't stop rambling!
Criterion A - 6: As I was listening, I noticed I didn't make nearly as many references to the text as I had wanted to, and the references I did make were lacking. I think I showed my knowledge and understanding of the text and the context around it, and I made enough references to the text to get myself a 6 in this category.
Criterion B - 2: I know for a fact that I mentioned nearly nothing on the effect of the reader, and I also know that I barely mentioned any of the stylistic elements that I had written down and while I harped on diction and connotation, I never mentioned anything else. Not my best at all.
Criterion C - 3: I think I was pretty coherent, however, I went over the time by over a minute. My entire conclusion would probably be cut off, so that really means that the IB wouldn't hear any of my wrap up. Also, I went a little off the rails and lost some of my organization.
Criterion D - 4: My language was pretty good, I said WAY TO MANY um's, but other than that and some corrections, I think that my language was actually pretty good! Probably overestimating myself on this one, but I needed to say I was good at something! :)
Total: 15/30 - I have no idea what this correlates to, but I definitely think I could do better.
Your outline seemed very effective and helped structured your practice IOC. However I feel it would be beneficial to focus less on the introduction for your outline, especially since you are only given 20 minutes to plan and analyze. I think it might be beneficial to write what each individual annotation means besides the markings and underling. This is for the purpose of keeping track of what needs to be said, which might be useful tool if you get stumpt when speaking. However, your overall IOC is strong and I'm sure you will do amazing on your actual one :)
ReplyDeleteHey!
ReplyDeleteA: 6
B: 4
C: 3
D: 4
I like the background you give and that you pretty much jump right in- you sound calm and organized. I think you've got a great use of devices here, but keep linking back to the overall purpose of the passage. That's really the effect. Keep thinking...why is Shakespeare doing what he's doing in the passage? How do you know? I also think you have clear organization in your planning, but thinking about the two questions I mention will help keep it more organized orally. Make sure you aren't just listing examples. Cameron gives you some GREAT advice above with how to really focus what you want to touch on and where.