“And,
ma’am,” he continued, “the laundress tells me some of the girls have
two clean tuckers in the week: it is too much; the rules limit them to
one.”
“Julia
Severn, ma’am! And why has she, or any other, curled hair? Why, in
defiance of every precept and principle of this house, does she conform
to the world so openly—here in an evangelical, charitable
establishment—as to wear her hair one mass of curls?”
“Naturally!
Yes, but we are not to conform to nature; I wish these girls to be the
children of Grace: and why that abundance? I have again and again
intimated that I desire the hair to be arranged closely, modestly,
plainly. Miss Temple, that girl’s hair must be cut off entirely; I will
send a barber to-morrow.”
“(T)hree
other visitors, ladies, now entered the room. They ought to have come a
little sooner to have heard his lecture on dress, for they were
splendidly attired in velvet, silk, and furs. The two younger of the
trio (fine girls of sixteen and seventeen) had grey beaver hats, then in
fashion, shaded with ostrich plumes, and from under the brim of this
graceful head-dress fell a profusion of light tresses, elaborately
curled; the elder lady was enveloped in a costly velvet shawl, trimmed
with ermine, and she wore a false front of French curls.”This passage is describing Mr. Brocklehurst's idea of what a girl should look like, and also describes his family members and the opposite appearance of what a girl should look like.
The passage starts with him saying that the girls should be limited to only one tucker, then continues with him criticizing a girl's naturally curly hair, and end with his family entering the room in expensive clothing.
The author uses irony in this passage to explain that Mr. Brocklehurst is a hypocrite. The irony is shown through the extremities between what Mr. Brocklehurst says and what his family represents. He wants to limit clothing down to one clean pair of clothes, yet his family is dressed so lavishly to the point of them looking like royalty. He says that the girl with curly hair - Julia Severn - should have her hair removed because she is too extravagant, yet his presumed wife has fake French curls in her hair.
These extremities represent the perceptions of social views at the time, and also shows how corrupt religion was during this time period.
Mr. Brocklehurst's lecture is a representation of the extremity that girls were expected to be at during the time. He expects the upmost modesty, which was something that was an expectation for women. As a figure of authority in the Church, Mr. Brocklehurst is expected to be modest as well as spiritual and adamant about being a close figure to God.
However, Mr. Brocklehurst has a family who dresses as if they are nobility, which tarnishes his supposed image inside the Church. As someone who is supposed to be modest, his family is incredibly corrupt in the sense that they do not dress like they are modest people.
These social outlooks contribute to the perception of religion in society at the time. The author shows it as corrupt and almost evil as they describe the situation in the passage. They reflect on Mr. Brocklehurst's character and how he is willing to make sure the rest of the world is modest, good, and faithful to God, but his family must dress as if they are deities.
The concept of irony in this passage shows the perception of religion at this time, which seemed to be a corrupt, almost evil part of society. This passage gave insight to what some people thought of religion in that time period.
Your analysis of the irony present with Mr. Brocklehurst is very well thought out. I also looked at the irony present here, but I took it a little bit differently. I saw the irony as a comment on social order. Mr. Brocklehurst and his family represent the upper class and the girls at the school represent the lower class. To me, the irony shows that the upper class didn't follow the same rules as everyone else because they thought they were somehow better. However, I really like your interpretation. I like how you folded religion into your interpretation to show corruption. Very interesting and very well written! Great job!
ReplyDeleteI think it's really interesting how you specifically focused on Mr. Brocklehurt's expectations of the girls at church and then his expectations of his family. I think it shows how Mr. Brocklehurst views himself as someone who is superior at the church and almost like a holy figure. I like your interpretation of the irony as well and how you incorporated religion as one of the main parts of the story and how irony is shown. Good job, Rachel :)
ReplyDeleteI really liked how you explained the role religion played in this passage, which helped to explain why the girl were to look modest, and how his family did the opposite. I agree with how you mentioned that the author is trying to show these two extremities and contrast them. This kind of reminds me of how Chaucer did the same when describing his characters. Like for example, the knight vs. the squire. Really well done blog post!
ReplyDeleteIt's very interesting how you described irony and tied it into how religion was looked at during that time. I totally agree with you that its irony but id say he could be a hypocrite as well? The fact that he expects the women to dress a certain way and then his family coming in dressing the complete opposite of his expectations due to him being a religious leader. I do agree that this is the author commenting on how religion being viewed as corrupt during that time.
ReplyDelete